Right then, just in case you haven’t heard, here’s the story. A woman, who works in the tech industry overheard two men behind her at a conference making jokes about ‘big dongles’. She promptly took to twitter to complain about what she had overheard. Her tweet was picked up by conference organisers and the guilty men were ejected. With me so far?
Not satisfied with this, the woman posted a photograph of one of the men on a social media page, identifying him as someone who had offended her. The result was, he was fired from his job.
Maybe due to the nature of the conference, it was full of tech people who are completely capable of using all social media networks to their full advantage, this whole thing quickly snowballed. The woman, I might as well name her, Adria Richards found her twitter page and her blog inundated with both messages of support as well as some rather scary threats. Her employer, SendGrid was also threatened and did indeed suffer a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service attack). Following this, SendGrid took the decision to fire Richards. The reason they gave for this was that the situation had taken on ‘a public nature’ and that terminating her employment was in the best interests of their employees and customers. “ Her decision to tweet the comments and photographs of the people who made the comments crossed the line,” said the Chief Executive of the company, Jim Franklin.
Rather than acting in anyone’s best interests this just made matters worse. Let’s go back and take a look at what the men said that was so bad as to have caused all this fuss.
The men in question do not deny that they were making very silly jokes about ‘big dongles’. Yes, really. Very silly. They then started talking about ‘forking someone’s repo’. In tech terms, the phrase ‘forking someone’s repo’ means to use someone else’s project as a spring board for one of your own. This is what one of the men in question had to say about it. (Quote taken from Hacker News, attributed to ‘mr-hank’ who claims to be the man who was fired).
“While I did make a big dongle joke about a fictional piece (of) hardware that identified as male, no sexual jokes were made about forking. My friends and I had decided forking someone’s repo is a new form of flattery (the highest form being implementation) and we were excited about one of the presenters projects; a friend said ‘I would fork that guys repo’ The sexual context was applied by Adria, and not us”.
Despite reading many testaments to the contrary, I am deeply suspicious that there was no intentional sexual connotation on the part of whom ever came up with the phrase. I would also aver that mr-hank, despite using this as his defence, is fully aware that the phrase does sound remarkably like a euphemism. It just does.
But hang on a minute – does this strike anyone else as being incredibly silly? How old are we all? (I’m 42). I am almost wondering why I decided to write a blog about this at all, it is so bloody ridiculous. Perhaps I should mind my language here, someone might find it offensive and report me.
I have worked in a predominately male IT Department, I have also held down a junior management position in the railway industry, guess how many women ‘made it’ here. What I am saying is, I know what it is like. I distinctly recall that when the secretary was on holiday during our monthly meetings, it was assumed that I would do the coffee run and take the minutes as I was the only other woman. I know what it is like to be made to feel uncomfortable and ‘other’.
I say this, as it seems to be the main theme of those defending her. This is from Rachel Sklar;
“Anyone who thinks that women won’t think twice about speaking up forcefully about this stuff is kidding themselves. Maybe not in the clear-cut situations, but in those blurry wait-maybe-it’s-me-should-I-just-learn-to-take-a-joke?-everyone-else-is-laughing situations that happen so often in rooms dominated by dudes, in an industry that often chides women to just get over the booth babe thing, learn to take a joke, stop complaining. It’s really easy to take a big swashbuckling stand on the easy, clear-cut cases”. http://www.businessinsider.com/rachel-sklar-on-adria-richards-and-sendgrid-2013-3#ixzz2OT5wsImC
I am certainly not going to say that she doesn’t make a great case against sexism in the work place but was this really sexism? I consider myself to be a feminist but the most these comments would get from me is a roll of the eyes and perhaps a ‘tut’. Their comments, at worst, were unprofessional and juvenile. They were at a conference and they should have been paying attention to the speaker, but so should she. Can we really be fired for making a silly (not racist or sexist or homophobic) joke to a friend who shares the same sense of humour? Really?
I am not going to say she was wrong to have the men ejected from the conference, perhaps they have learned a valuable lesson in appropriate and professional conduct but it is her actions after that really have to be questioned. Did she really need to take the matter personally and make it public? She most certainly did not need to post a photograph of the man in question. She says that she had no intention of getting the man fired, but what were her intentions? She certainly meant him some kind of harm, it was vindictive and as a self-proclaimed social media expert, she must have known that no good could possibly come of such actions.
Whilst Rachel Sklar has framed Adria Richard’s very actions in feminist terms, I think that is the industry’s and the public’s reaction to Richards that will have feminist’s shaking their heads in despair (and I do include myself here). The threats and other truly vile comments which have appeared on Adria’s Twitter page and other sites following the incident are astonishing.
Here’s a selection to give you a flavour. (Taken from contributors to http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/a-dongle-joke-that-spiraled-way-out-of-control/)
-
“Just like a woman. Complain, complain, complain! She obviously needs a life!”
-
“I hope people make a note of her name and she gets blacklisted from any job offerings in the future. This is why people like this bitch Adria need to stay at home. What a c*nt”.
-
“Glad they fired this hag”.
-
“She needs a smack in the mouth”
This one however takes the biscuit. I am not going to include a link as I won’t give the idiot publicity, but I am sure you can google it if you think he is worth the effort. “Rape is fun, or let’s f**k up Adria Richards”. This delightful post incites people to create photoshop masterpieces using images of Adria Richards along with pornographic images including those involving rape. The page owner is offering a prize for the best one. Can someone please tell me how on Earth we got here? Is this amount of misogynist feeling still bubbling under the surface in all work places?
To say that this has snowballed is an understatement, there has been an avalanche. Two people have lost their jobs and in the current climate this could be catastrophic, especially considering the public storm it has caused. Adria Richards has a very public profile and even if the man who has been fired isn’t easily identifiable to me, here in my dining room in the UK, I have no doubt that most people in the industry local to him, know who he is.
Here’s an idea – let’s reinstate both of them, I dare say ‘mr-hank’ has been reprimanded but by all means, reprimanded him again. Maybe he could be reminded to behave in a more professional manner when representing his company at conferences. It could perhaps be pointed out to him that the word ‘dongle’ may be hysterically funny to a 12-year-old, but when you’re old enough to be at work you should possibly have gotten over that. I have no doubt that Adria Richards has been left with a very firm impression that her employers are pretty miffed with her conduct too. I’m sure though, that the fact her actions smacked of vindictiveness could be reiterated and there is obviously room for a reminder of appropriate channels for work related complaints.
Whilst I do think that Adria Richard’s acted inappropriately, the reaction to her, which was predominately directed toward her sex have served to highlight the underlying sexism that still exists in many industries and work places. I can’t however find it within myself to congratulate her as I do not believe that this was her intention. I am of the opinion that she acted out of spite and this in itself is just as shameful as the childish behaviour the men were engaging in.
I was going to conclude with something along the lines of ‘all learning valuable lessons’ but that would be condescending. We are after all, all adults – aren’t we?